Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Deprecations for PHP 8.4

From: Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 12:36:54 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Deprecations for PHP 8.4
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-124646@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 27 July 2024 00:58:17 BST, Morgan <weedpacket@varteg.nz> wrote: > >I'm not talking about the MD5 or SHA1 algorithms or whether they should or shouldn't >be used. I'm just talking about the functions themselves. md5(), md5_file(), sha1(), and >sha1_file(). They only exist because there wasn't the generic hash algorithm extension when >they were created. I understand what is being claimed (and you're not the only one claiming it), I'm just not convinced it's true. I think they have standalone functions for the same reason we added str_contains and str_starts_with - because it's convenient to have straightforward functions for common use cases. The hash() function is like a 60-piece set of interchangeable screwdriver heads, which only professionals and enthusiasts need; md5() and sha1() are like the flat-head and Phillips screwdrivers that everyone has in a drawer somewhere. The thing that always surprises me is that PHP *doesn't* have a standalone function for SHA-256, which is the only other I've ever used. To continue the analogy, we're missing a Pozidriv screwdriver, so people are misusing the Phillips one. The RFC is suggesting that we take away their flat-head and Phillips screwdrivers, and leave them with the 60-piece set, and no instructions. My suggestion is we instead give them a Pozidriv screwdriver, and write some tips on how to use it correctly. Regards, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]

« previous php.internals (#124646) next »