Re: [RFC] Add Directive to M ake All Namespaced Function CallsGlobal

On 4 August 2024 13:08:22 BST, "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@gmx.de> wrote: >On 04.08.2024 at 13:42, Nick Lockheart wrote: > >> To that end, I have created the following RFC: >> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/global_function_parser_directive >> I am asking that we discuss and vote on the following question: > >Please open a new thread about your RFC (i.e. don't reply to some other >message, but rather send a new message to the mailing list). Otherwise >it might easily be overlooked. See also ><https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto>. Please can people stop replying on this sub-thread until a proper new thread is created. I know GMail and some other mail clients have a heuristic definition of "conversation", but many clients and archives - including the widely used externals.io - are based on the standardised Reply-To and Thread-Id headers, which are not reset based on a new subject line. In those UIs, this is still part of the completely unrelated deprecation voting thread <https://externals.io/message/124506>, which was already becoming unmanageably long due to the protracted debate about hashing functions. Regards, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]