Re: Anyone against requiring libxml2 2.6.x for PHP5.1?
| From: | Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg | Date: | Tue, 15 Feb 2005 04:49:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Anyone against requiring libxml2 2.6.x for PHP5.1? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-14953@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Well, that's below 2.5.11, which is what we currently require, so
those folks are already out of luck.
Meanwhile, Mac OS 10.4 is at 2.6.16, so that's okay. I don't have a
10.3 machine with me here at LinuxWorld, so I can't check that.
-adam
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Wez Furlong wrote:
> Meanwhile, RHEL customers are on libxml2-2.5.10-6.
>
> --Wez.
>
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:14:01 -0500, Mike Robinson <mike@fiddy8.com> wrote:
> > I believe Debian and Fedora (Core 3) is up to 2.6.11 or better.
> > IMHO requiring 2.6.x isn't too much of a stretch.
>
>
--
adam@trachtenberg.com | http://www.trachtenberg.com
author of o'reilly's "upgrading to php 5" and "php cookbook"
avoid the holiday rush, buy your copies today!