Re: Anyone against requiring libxml2 2.6.x for PHP5.1?
| From: | Ryan King | Date: | Tue, 15 Feb 2005 05:49:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Anyone against requiring libxml2 2.6.x for PHP5.1? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-14958@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Feb 14, 2005, at 9:26 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Attachment: [application/pkcs7-signature] smime.p7s
D.Walsh wrote:I completely agree with what you're saying here. The only problem is that 10.3 is the current version of Mac OS X. 10.4 won't be out until at least late March. -ryan -- http://theryanking.com/blogOn Feb 14, 2005, at 23:49, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:At the same time, why would people on older operating systems who are obviously quite conservative when it comes to upgrading suddenly try to upgrade to the very latest PHP? As long as we don't move the goalposts beyond the latest releases of the various main operating systems I think we are fine.Well, that's below 2.5.11, which is what we currently require, so those folks are already out of luck. Meanwhile, Mac OS 10.4 is at 2.6.16, so that's okay. I don't have a 10.3 machine with me here at LinuxWorld, so I can't check that.OSX 10.3 is at 2.5.4
Attachment: [application/pkcs7-signature] smime.p7s