Re: Anyone against requiring libxml2 2.6.x for PHP5.1?
| From: | D . Walsh | Date: | Tue, 15 Feb 2005 05:05:34 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Anyone against requiring libxml2 2.6.x for PHP5.1? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-14956@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Feb 14, 2005, at 23:49, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
Well, that's below 2.5.11, which is what we currently require, so those folks are already out of luck. Meanwhile, Mac OS 10.4 is at 2.6.16, so that's okay. I don't have a 10.3 machine with me here at LinuxWorld, so I can't check that.OSX 10.3 is at 2.5.4
-adam On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Wez Furlong wrote:-- DaleMeanwhile, RHEL customers are on libxml2-2.5.10-6. --Wez. On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:14:01 -0500, Mike Robinson <mike@fiddy8.com> wrote:-- adam@trachtenberg.com | http://www.trachtenberg.comI believe Debian and Fedora (Core 3) is up to 2.6.11 or better. IMHO requiring 2.6.x isn't too much of a stretch.