Re: Anyone against requiring libxml2 2.6.x for PHP5.1?

From: Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:29:03 +0000
Subject: Re: Anyone against requiring libxml2 2.6.x for PHP5.1?
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-15039@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
At 18:38 16/02/2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Given the way XML is used in xmlrpc and SOAP systems, I don't think I would classify a security problem in libxml as a local exploit.
I know, that's why I said 'most', and not 'all' (some exploits may have more far reaching effects, for certain users). But again, if we do something like what I suggested (use the system library if it's good enough, use the bundled one if it isn't), we get the good of both worlds. Security-conscious people will have an uptodate library anyway. Those who aren't will get an out-of-the-box experience, that otherwise they wouldn't have gotten. Zeev

« previous php.internals (#15039) next »