Re: PHP 6.0 Wishlist
| From: | Xuefer | Date: | Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:05:45 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP 6.0 Wishlist | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-18041@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> >> This is the first one that comes to my mind:
> >>
> >> int strpos (string haystack, mixed needle [, int offset])
> >>
> > And this is why they're inconsistent to begin with. When I look at strpos() I
> > think: strchr(char *, int) So the parameter ordering does make sense there
> > (to me).
>
> Yes, coming from a C background you would think like that.
> But when you think about it with some logic (not women's logic :):
>
> "I'm looking for a character inside a string."
>
> Thus: strpos(needle, haystack) is the correct way (tm) =)
no, it should be "$a = (look for $needle inside $hystack);", and can
never be a php language
if we always strict the garmmar of native language to be a basic of a
programming language, we might mixed everything up. until the day your
computer passed turin turing test.
> I agree, though I don't really care so long as its the same in all
> the str* and array* functions
but sadly it's not. for str_replace, the 3rd argument is more or less
a "haystack" and the 1st argument is needle