Re: Patch for macros for tracking refcount and is_ref

On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Marcus Boerger wrote: > Tuesday, September 4, 2007, 6:38:17 PM, you wrote: > > > If ever a version of this patch is committed, you'll be able to see > > that the cycle collector touches the whole reference counting mess > > extremely minimally, which is why it was relatively safe to implement. > > Question for development, how do we ensure that starting from a specific > point in time we enforce usage of those macros? The one thing that comes > into my mind is that we could have the members [is_ref,refcount] prefixed > with something different when running in debug mode, or insert some random > prefix there....(?) Yeah, that's what a previous patch did - I assume something like this is part of the patch that comes after this macrofication patch. regards, Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org