Re: Patch for macros for tracking refcount and is_ref
| From: | David Wang | Date: | Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:19:05 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Patch for macros for tracking refcount and is_ref | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-32059@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 9/5/07, Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net> wrote:
> What is the problem with those objects? Basically there are at least three
> seperated memory areas involved. First the zend_object container, the real
> object and one or several zvals. The gc would simply have to decrease
> refcount on zend_objects if their zval gets down to zero and then leave
> zend_object gc'ing to the object storage.
Hmm, maybe we have a misunderstanding here because I don't quite
understand what you mean. :) In that paragraph, I was saying how
implementing a traditional tracing garbage collector would mean
refcounts are no longer necessary. These macros track refcounts, so
they would also be no longer necessary.
> Question for development, how do we ensure that starting from a specific
> point in time we enforce usage of those macros? The one thing that comes
> into my mind is that we could have the members [is_ref,refcount] prefixed
> with something different when running in debug mode, or insert some random
> prefix there....(?)
In my own code, I have a "__gc" on refcount and is_ref so I get thrown
an error if there's a place I failed to macroize. I removed that for
this patch, but that's a very good point. If there are no objections,
that or another prefix or suffix can be put back into the patch.
David