Re: array_has_more
| From: | Andi Gutmans | Date: | Sat, 05 Jul 2003 18:40:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: array_has_more | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-3268@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
The problem isn't the ending. The problem is that according to our naming conventions it should be array_foobar() whereas the other array functions were invented before our conventions and are short names such as next(). Now on one hand we wouldn't want to pollute the PHP function space with new non-conforming function names but on the other hand it is really ugly to have a new function which looks completely different from the original ones...
Andi
At 01:25 PM 5/7/2003 -0400, Greg Beaver wrote:
Hi, How about array_has_next() to reference the php function? Greg Marcus BöRger wrote:Anyway you said that you don't like the name really. Do you have a better name? If not i'll go with 'array_has_more'.