Re: Re: untie the MD4 code from MD5 & replace the MD5 code

Hi Alexander, On Feb 7, 2008 3:08 PM, Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com> wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:00:55PM +0100, Pierre Joye wrote: > > Nice addition but can you please try to keep on thread for the > > discussions? Thanks :-) > > Are you referring to the changing Subject? Yes, three times in a row made me thought that it would be nice to keep one thread to discuss this change :) > If so, I prefer Subjects > that reflect message content, whereas threading can, should, and usually > does rely on Message-ID, In-Reply-To, and References headers. If this > mailing list has a different rule - such as to keep the Subject fixed > even when discussion deviates - I am willing to follow it indeed... In > fact, this is what I did now (kept the Subject although this message is > not on the patch anymore), even though I dislike having to do it. No big deal but I don't see a different topic, it is about your patch and to replace the existing implementation :) Anyway, great work!! Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org