Re: [PATCH] Some string changes/optimizations

From: Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:05:26 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Some string changes/optimizations
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-38904@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Patch seems ok to me, although I haven't tested it. But let's see what Dmitry thinks about it. I'm not sure about the removal of the nowdoc tokens, though. Somebody may me relying on them for pretty-printing.. Nuno ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Wilmas" <php_lists@realplain.com> To: <internals@lists.php.net> Cc: "Dmitry Stogov" <dmitry@zend.com>; "Nuno Lopes" <nlopess@php.net> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 1:45 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Some string changes/optimizations
Hi all, I had been meaning to update this patch for a while (after conflicting updates to some files), and finally did. :-) See original message for more details... There's been one change for strings -- before, I was moving the first ADD_* op into INIT_STRING, but wasn't too satisfied with that. So I eliminated the INIT_STRING opcode after realizing that simply setting the string to NULL makes it create a new string in add_string_to_string (the first ADD_* has op1 set to IS_UNUSED; otherwise it's still IS_TMP_VAR, though it's not "used" after my changes). Is this OK? The other prior changes seem fine to me: syntax highlighting consistency, combining the duplicate heredoc/nowdoc stuff and removing the NOWDOC tokens, allowing static heredocs to be used in static contexts, etc.? http://realplain.com/php/string_optimizations.diff http://realplain.com/php/string_optimizations_5_3.diff Remember to regenerate the scanner/parser with re2c/bison and run zend_vm_gen.php! I also included possible NEWS updates in the 5.3 patch this time. :-P Thanks for any feedback, Matt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Wilmas" Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008
Hi all, This patch... Saves one opcode per interpolated string [snip, old info] Next, after nowdoc support was added, I noticed it was mostly duplicate heredoc code in the scanner, so I combined them for the most part,
removing
the NOWDOC tokens, etc. Is that OK? It seems like they may have just
been
there for the parser... but I updated the parser so that static heredocs also work like nowdocs. Also removed the ST_START_[HEREDOC|NOWDOC] states in the scanner, by doing their work (to catch immediate ending label) in
the
initial heredoc rule. While removing the NOWDOC references from zend_highlight.c, I made a
little
change that I think improves (err... adds) highlighting of variables in double-quoted strings, and makes literal text in heredocs/backticks the correct "highlight_string" color. This makes coloring consistent across
all
strings. :-) Before/after example:
http://realplain.com/php/highlight.html
Speaking of backticks, while updating their parser grammar, they now
behave
more precisely like shell_exec(), in that cmd (constant string) or
$cmd
(one variable) won't use INIT_STRING and create a temporary variable... Oh, almost forgot a couple things -- for HEAD: [snip] moved HANDLE_NEWLINES() so nowdoc text is copied first, otherwise the line
number
would be off if there's an error in zend_copy_scanner_string. [snip] http://realplain.com/php/string_optimizations.diff http://realplain.com/php/string_optimizations_5_3.diff Thanks, Matt P.S. (for Marcus?), the ({LABEL}|([']{LABEL}['])|(["]{LABEL}["])) part of the heredoc rule crashed re2c (Windows) until I added the extra ( ), which shouldn't be needed AFAIK and was fine with just 2 alternate matches...


« previous php.internals (#38904) next »