Re: [RFC] Zend Signal Handling
| From: | Lukas Kahwe Smith | Date: | Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:11:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Zend Signal Handling | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-39480@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 30.07.2008, at 21:05, Arnaud Le Blanc wrote:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 20:46:13 Jani Taskinen wrote:I am a bit unsure how to proceed here. Maybe Johannes is more confident with a judgement here. It seems everybody is very much looking forward to getting in this patch (with some tweaks). Now my question is, do we apply as is for alpha1? It does not seem like this patch is quite important enough to delay the release (then again one more day is not going to kill us .. if all it takes is one more day that is) Or does it make sense to introduce this change in alpha2? regards, Lukas Kahwe Smith mls@pooteeweet.orgArnaud Le Blanc kirjoitti:toHi, On Wednesday 30 July 2008 18:37:26 Dmitry Stogov wrote:I see several issues with the patch 1) It assumes that web server (and webserver extensions) won't setup any signal handlers after PHP startup. This assumption may be wrong. 2) It is incompatible with ext/pcntlIf zend_signal() is improved (has Lucas planed to do) to allow extensionsHi, This new signal handling may fix this sort of things if enabled in ZTS. I think this patch may include support for ZTS too (I'm investigating how it can).use it, then pcntl can do so and become compatible with that.Since this seems related, maybe someone ought to check this out too: http://bugs.php.net/16820 A bit "old" bug but has some relation to part below.