Re: alternative to the fopen() hack in autoloaders

include_silent is the name I though most intuitive once I finished to read the RFC. But it may not be the best too. It just need to be verbose. Cheers, On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <mls@pooteeweet.org> wrote: > Ahoi, > > I have written an RFC for a more efficient solution to get rid of the common > fopen() hack inside autoloaders: > if ($fp = @fopen($file, 'r', true)) { > fclose($fp); > include $file; > } > > Here is the gist of the proposal: > In order to solve the above issues this RFC proposes the addition of a new > construct/function for now called “autoload_include” for lack of a better > name that largely behaves like the “include” does today with the following > differences, that when the include failed because of a missing file no > warning is raised and php null is returned. > > Further details can be found on the wiki: > http://wiki.php.net/rfc/autoload_include > > As stated in the RFC, I am not happy with the name "autoload_include". > Suggestions welcome! > > regards, > Lukas Kahwe Smith > mls@pooteeweet.org > > > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Guilherme Blanco - Web Developer CBC - Certified Bindows Consultant Cell Phone: +55 (16) 9215-8480 MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com URL: http://blog.bisna.com São Paulo - SP/Brazil