Re: Re: alternative to the fopen() hack in autoloaders

From: Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:20:43 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: alternative to the fopen() hack in autoloaders
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-46000@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > >> Alternatively include() could be extended to allow resources, so the >> above would turn info >> >> if ($fp = @fopen($file, 'r', true)) { >> include($fp); >> fclose($fp); >> } > > This would break security distinction between file ops and include ops, > when URLs are allowed for open but not include. Yes, I was going to say, this sounds like a very bad idea security-wise. We'd be back to the local vs. remote resource identification problem. -Rasmus

« previous php.internals (#46000) next »