Re: Re: alternative to the fopen() hack in autoloaders
| From: | Rasmus Lerdorf | Date: | Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:20:43 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: alternative to the fopen() hack in autoloaders | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-46000@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Alternatively include() could be extended to allow resources, so the
>> above would turn info
>>
>> if ($fp = @fopen($file, 'r', true)) {
>> include($fp);
>> fclose($fp);
>> }
>
> This would break security distinction between file ops and include ops,
> when URLs are allowed for open but not include.
Yes, I was going to say, this sounds like a very bad idea security-wise.
We'd be back to the local vs. remote resource identification problem.
-Rasmus