Re: RFC: Making T_FUNCTION optional in method declarations
| From: | Ferenc Kovacs | Date: | Sat, 27 Nov 2010 21:05:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Making T_FUNCTION optional in method declarations | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-50639@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
2010/11/27 Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org>
> Sorry for moving offtopic, but if the PHP syntax is going to change then we
> should revisit other proposals that add/change syntax. For example, I think
> the short syntax for arrays was declined [from 5.3] mainly because it
> introduced a new syntax at a time we wanted to preserve BC:
>
> - http://wiki.php.net/rfc/shortsyntaxforarrays
>
> Regards,
> Philip
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
I would love both feature, I think we should finalize the release
process/roadmap, and after that, it would be a good idea to revisit the
pending/declined rfc-s in the light of the roadmap.
Tyrael