Re: RFC: Making T_FUNCTION optional in method declarations

From: Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 13:06:07 +0000
Subject: Re: RFC: Making T_FUNCTION optional in method declarations
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-50809@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
2010/12/2 André Rømcke <ar@ez.no>: > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Patrick ALLAERT <patrickallaert@php.net> > wrote: >> Shouldn't we get rid of that kind of pre-PHP5 stuff _before_ >> introducing the possible omission of T_FUNCTION? > > Why? > This will break lots of code, does it improve anything while at it? Is 'var' > hindering anything? Is it taking up a lot of code? > If it is removed then that should be in trunk aka "6.0" the 2nd , and not in > 5.x. It should of course not appear in a 5.x release! But sounds like current trunk can't be anyway. +1 for removing T_VAR and making T_FUNCTION optional in a major release. -1 otherwise. -- Patrick Allaert --- http://code.google.com/p/peclapm/ - Alternative PHP Monitor

« previous php.internals (#50809) next »