Re: RFC: Making T_FUNCTION optional in method declarations

From: Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:52:12 +0000
Subject: Re: RFC: Making T_FUNCTION optional in method declarations
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-50662@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 28.11.10 16:14, Gustavo Lopes wrote: > On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:58:13 -0000, David Otton > <phpmail@jawbone.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: >> As a plea on behalf of maintenance coders dealing with large, messy >> codebases, please, please don't impact our ability to run 'grep -rs >> "function functionName" *', or hit F8, or whatever your IDE's >> equivalent is. > > IDEs would not be a problem, they would certainly be updated to locate > definitions under the new syntax. As to grep, surely you could use > another regular expression, perhaps egrep -rs "(public|function) > functionName" or something similar. At least one would have to use the following expression: (public|protected|private|final|static|function) functionName - Martin, -1

« previous php.internals (#50662) next »