RE: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-DEV [RFC] Property Accessors v1.2
| From: | Clint Priest | Date: | Sat, 13 Oct 2012 04:43:34 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-DEV [RFC] Property Accessors v1.2 | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-63382@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I must have missed taking that part out of the RFC, they would not be needed any more with those
keywords being removed.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Levi Morrison [mailto:morrison.levi@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 9:45 AM
> To: Clint Priest
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-DEV [RFC] Property Accessors v1.2
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Clint Priest <cpriest@zerocue.com> wrote:
> > Alright, here is the updated RFC as per discussions for the last few days:
> >
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-as-implemented
> >
> > If you could read it over, make sure I have all of your concerns correctly addressed and
> > we can leave this open for the two week
> waiting period while I make the final code changes.
> >
> > -Clint
> >
>
> I'm not sure if that RFC is up to date; are
>
ZEND_ACC_READONLY and
> ZEND_ACC_WRITEONLY still there? Are there still 79 test cases?
> I'd like to see wider coverage if you can think of more things to tests.
> Ideally every conditional statement has a test.
>
> I used to be very against this RFC but I admit the details have improved a lot with the ability
> to type hint and the removal of read and
> write only keywords.
>
> Levi Morrison