RE: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-DEV [RFC] Property Accessors v1.2
| From: | Clint Priest | Date: | Sat, 13 Oct 2012 04:55:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-DEV [RFC] Property Accessors v1.2 | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-63384@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Yeah, if you check out the section in the RFC on static properties I give examples of both of these
cases, I have not tested the use of static::$zz though come to think of it, I will put it on my todo
list.
From: Jazzer Dane [mailto:tbprogrammer@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 12:32 AM
To: Clint Priest
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-DEV [RFC] Property Accessors v1.2
I like it.
I assume that, in regards to static properties, the static keyword works just as well as self and
parent, correct?
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Clint Priest <cpriest@zerocue.com<mailto:cpriest@zerocue.com>> wrote:
Alright, here is the updated RFC as per discussions for the last few days:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-as-implemented
If you could read it over, make sure I have all of your concerns correctly addressed and we can
leave this open for the two week waiting period while I make the final code changes.
-Clint