Re: [RFC] Revert/extend/postpone original RFC about read_only, lazy_write sessions

> "lazy_write" is not accepted. So you don't need to mention it in the RFC. Yes, it is. People (including yourself) have voted +1 for "Read only, lazy write option". > "read_only" option is better/much faster version of "session_start(); > session_commit()". > If the name "read_only" is confusing, better name would be appreciated. I know what it is, Yasuo ... half of the RFC is about it, please read it carefully. > "write short cut" is there, since it does not affect > existing behavior > nor save handlers at all. The public probably doesn't know what "write short cut" is, because it's only mentioned in a separate discussion. So, for the public, it is this: https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=17860 ... or in other words, a non-optional version of 'lazy_write'. It does affect current functionality ... it's described in the RFC as 'lazy_write'. Regards, Andrey.