Re: [RFC] Revert/extend/postpone original RFC about read_only, lazy_write sessions

Hi Andrey, On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Andrey Andreev <narf@devilix.net> wrote: > > It updates time stamp always. > > > > It does > > > > "write data if data is updated" > > or > > "write data if save handler does not have update API" > > or > > "update time stamp if it is needed" (e.g. memcache does not need to > update > > time stamp since it updates time stamp by read. It's save handler > > implementation choice what to do with update API) > > > > For save handlers like memcahe/memcached, session module is writing back > the > > same data just to waste resources when session data hasn't changed. > > And what about userland session handlers? It's the same as C written module. Unless there is update() method, session module writes session data always. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net