Re: [RFC] Bare Name Array

From: Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 19:23:37 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Bare Name Array
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-74674@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Sorry, I didn't realize that this would not change the current behaviour. Should be possible to mix both declarations? define('FOO', 'bar'); > $data = array(FOO => 'bar', FOO :> 'baz'); On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote: > > On 1 Jun 2014, at 19:56, Rafael Kassner <kassner@php.net> wrote: > > > You missed my point, I'm not saying about undefined constants, I'm saying > > about the usage of defined constants as array keys. If the array > > declaration don't expand constants to strings anymore, many code will > > break. > > I haven’t changed that. => still works the same as ever. I’m adding a > colon syntax which takes a bare name instead of an expression. > > > If we expand constants within array declaration, someone can mess up > > the code by adding a define() somewhere above and don't even realize > what's > > wrong (constants have global scope). > > But that’s how it works at present. People writing array(foo => 3) and > assuming that’s the same as array(‘foo’ => 3) need to try turning > display_errors on. > -- > Andrea Faulds > http://ajf.me/ > > > > >

« previous php.internals (#74674) next »