Re: BC break in 5.4.29 and 5.5.13

From: Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 17:24:24 +0000
Subject: Re: BC break in 5.4.29 and 5.5.13
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-74953@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote: > generally BC breaks are not allowed in micro versions, but this doesn't > mean that we can't change existing behavior in micro versions. > currently there are 3 cases where we have precedence changing behavior in > micro versions: > > - bugfix > - changing (explicitly) undefined behavior > - introducing a new class/function/method/constant (I don't like this, > but it seems that it is the consensus seems to be that this is okay). It is definitively not OK. I cannot imagine any feature that cannot x.y+1, which happens less than a year later. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org

« previous php.internals (#74953) next »