Re: Fixing (and making easier) Apache mod_proxy_fcgi with PHP-FPM

Bump? We've been running http://github.com/php/php-src/pull/694 in production at Heroku for a while now, with no issues. I really think this should be in 5.6, too. It'll make setting up PHP-FPM so much less painful on Apache once their new release is out. And if someone could also please review and commit https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=65641 (or find a better way; I'll be glad to help with anything like setting up Apache accordingly etc), then even with current versions of Apache, PHP will finally work fine. Currently, quite a few frameworks etc that use (or rewrite to) PATH_INFO are plainly broken. Thanks, David On 17.06.2014, at 14:33, David Zuelke <dz@heroku.com> wrote: > On 13.06.2014, at 17:19, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Julien Pauli <jpauli@php.net> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Could we still squeeze this fix into 5.2.14? I know you just rolled RC1 >>>>> (while I was fiddling with this stuff), but it would be so, so huge to have >>>>> this in… or at least in 5.2.15. >>>>> >>>> >>>> just to prevent confusion, you meant 5.5.14 and 5.5.15 here. >>> >>> Obviously 5.5.X yes. >>> >>> I myself answered that I dont see any criticity to roll out an RC2 for >>> 5.5.14, just for this specific bug. >>> I think it can go to 5.5.15 or any version as far as the patch is >>> tested and merged up. >> >> Given the security issues fixes waiting to be released, I would not >> delay the releases any longer. > > So, who wants to merge the PR? :) > > And if someone could review and possibly apply any of the > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=65641 attachments that'd be > great too, although I suspect that it's possible to fix the problem way further up in the code > so that this stripping of stuff isn't even necessary at such a "late" stage. > > With those two out of the way, PHP-FPM and Apache will be a lot, lot easier to set up together. > One bit of config, done. > > David > > P.S. would be great for 5.4 too I think, not just 5.5+! > >