Re: Fixing (and making easier) Apache mod_proxy_fcgi with PHP-FPM

From: Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 23:58:48 +0000
Subject: Re: Fixing (and making easier) Apache mod_proxy_fcgi with PHP-FPM
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-75134@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
(to clarify: when using 2.4.10+ with SetHandler and the now merged PR, the bug doesn't occur, but if people are using mod_rewrite, or ProxyPass(Match), either because they don't know about the new method or are stuck on older versions of Apache, bug 65641 is still relevant) On 29.06.2014, at 16:51, David Zuelke <dz@heroku.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the merge, but the just-merged PR addresses a different issue than bug 65641. That > one is still unaddressed. > > The NEWS entry for the just-merged PR should be something like "Support Apache 2.4.10+ > SetHandler method for mod_proxy_fcgi and PHP-FPM", and bug 65641 should be re-opened. > > I'll see if I can look at the patches for bug 65641 again the next few days; my gut > feeling is that there should be a much easier way of fixing this. After all, the patches all strip > out parts of a string that shouldn't be there in the first place. > > David > > > On 27.06.2014, at 15:27, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:51 PM, David Zuelke <dz@heroku.com> wrote: >> On 27.06.2014, at 00:39, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jun 26, 2014 10:30 PM, "David Zuelke" <dz@heroku.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 26.06.2014, at 12:23, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Jun 26, 2014 9:12 PM, "David Zuelke" <dz@heroku.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> That's what RCs are for, right? :) >>>>> >>>>> In an ideal world with ideal users yes. >>>>> >>>>> But we are not in that world :) >>>> >>>> I know :) >>>> >>> >>> So what is wrong in putting us on the safe? Waiting 2 months max is not that bad :) >> >> Sure, but then it would be good to have this in the next 5.6 RC, that'll probably get >> more testing exposure, too. >> >> Either way, someone should please commit it into some branch soon ;) >> >> David >> >> >> Was waiting for Stas to reply, I will merge it into 5.6 this weekend if he doesn't >> reply that he wants to merge it into 5.4, then we can test it with the 5.6RCs and merge back to >> 5.4/5.5. >> >> -- >> Ferenc Kovács >> @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu >

« previous php.internals (#75134) next »