Re: [RFC] Default constructors
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:23:08 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Default constructors | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-78939@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to propose the following RFC, which in short would allow any
> method to call parent ctor (and some other methods) even if such is not
> explicitly defined:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/default_ctor
>
> The reasons are outlined in detail in the RFC and here:
> http://php100.wordpress.com/2014/11/04/default-constructors/
>
> The patch is not finished yet but seems to be working fine, I'll add it
> to the RFC this week as soon as I finish it. I'd like to put idea out
> there in the meantime and hear what everybody thinks about it.
You write:
> Also, this can lead to more subtle BC breaks. Consider this code:
And then further on:
> No backward incompatible changes, sin...
that can not be both right.
cheers,
Derick