Re: [RFC] Default constructors

Hi! > Thanks for bringing this up and working on the patch. > Last time we discussed > this(http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?7,712222,712635), there were > a couple of people including Anthony and Sanford who were agains this > feature arguing that it would encourage bad practices so I think it Obviously, I disagree with that. I do not see any bad practices it encourages - if anything, it encourages the good practice of always calling parent ctor, practice considered so good by many that some languages make it mandatory. The discussion of __call etc. presented there does not seem too relevant for me - __call was never called on missing ctor and it makes zero sense to do so since no sane implementation uses __call do dispatch constructors. I'll need to check though if my changes don't have BC impact on __call (they should not, but I did not check before, so I'll check that too). Thanks, Stas