Re: [RFC] Skipping parameters take 2

> On 15/01/2015, at 06:33, Marcio Almada <marcio.web2@gmail.com> wrote: > > Marc Bennewitz, Stas, > >> But I think adding "default" as new keyword is a big BC break! >> I personally also don't like it and asked myself why can't the parameter > simply skipped? > > Default is already a reserved word AFAIK. But I've been thinking about > alternatives to parameter skipping syntax which brought me the Golang > blank identifier _ to mind: > > create_query("deleted=0", "name", _, _, true); > > Still not sure if it's better than default, though. That would be a BC break as you can currently have a constant _. An existing keyword makes upgrading easier, and default is easier to understand by someone who doesn’t know about the feature than an underscore. --- Simon Welsh Admin of http://91carriage.com/ – Specialised SilverStripe hosting