Re: [RFC] Skipping parameters take 2

From: Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:01:20 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Skipping parameters take 2
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-80716@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Just a note: I still think a single char token (like ~) would look great and wouldn't be "cryptic" like Yasuo argued. But, as said before, it's just a minor observation. The default token is a great option and sounds very intuitive to anyone I've asked for opinions. 2015-01-17 22:52 GMT-03:00 Marcio Almada <marcio.web2@gmail.com>: >> Cryptic notation is not a PHP way. IMHO.I like original "default" proposal and it >> is good enough. >> Regards, > > When I suggested _ it was more as a feature wandering. I like > default too. The RFC looks good enough as it is now :) > > 2015-01-17 22:14 GMT-03:00 Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>: >> Hi all, >> >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Patrick Schaaf <php@bof.de> wrote: >>> >>> Am 14.01.2015 20:50 schrieb "Simon J Welsh" <simon@welsh.co.nz>: >>> > >>> > > create_query("deleted=0", "name", _, _, true); >>> > > >>> > > Still not sure if it's better than >>> > > default, though. >>> > >>> > That would be a BC break as you can currently have a constant _. >>> >>> A visually pleasing (IMO), even easier to type, and non-BC alternative, >>> could be using a dash: >>> >>> create_query("deleted=0", "name", -, -, true); >> >> >> Cryptic notation is not a PHP way. IMHO. >> I like original "default" proposal and it is good enough. >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Yasuo Ohgaki >> yohgaki@ohgaki.net

« previous php.internals (#80716) next »