Re: [RFC] Skipping parameters take 2
| From: | Marc Bennewitz | Date: | Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:15:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Skipping parameters take 2 | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-80479@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Stas,
I really like this RFC. It makes it simple to use defined defaults without the need to know about them of to updated.
But I think adding "default" as new keyword is a big BC break!
I personally also don't like it and asked myself why can't the parameter simply skipped?
function foo ($a='a', $b='b') {}
foo();
foo($a);
foo(, $b);
foo($a,);
foo(,);
Is it possible to use the default parameter on inheritance?
class Bar {
function foo($a='a', $b='b') {}
}
class Baz extends Bar {
function foo($a=default, $b=default) {
// do something
parent::foo($a, $b);
}
}
Marc
Am 02.09.2013 um 09:17 schrieb Stas Malyshev:
Hi! I've finally took some time to revive the skipping parameter RFC and patch. For those who doesn't remember what it is please see: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/skipparams TLDR version: The idea is to allow skipping parameters in function with optional arguments so that this:function create_query($where, $order_by, $join_type='INNER', $execute= false, $report_errors = true) can be called like this:create_query("deleted=0", "name", default, default,/*report_errors*/ true); Instead of trying to remember what the defaults are. The patch is here: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/426 Any comments or feedback on the RFCs and the code are welcome, especially pointing out the cases where it may not work (which means we need more phpt's there :)