Re: Re: [RFC] Exceptions in the engine

Hi Dmitry, On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote: > I'm not sure. Currently we don't use namespaces for core classes, but I > won't object to change this. > Nikita, what do you think? > > Thanks. Dmitry. > > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Trevor Suarez <rican7@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I think that naming the new parent exception something like "Throwable" >>> or >>> "Catchable" (as Nikita previously suggested) would be a bit more concise >>> in >>> meaning than "BaseException". You may not have even meant that name as a >>> formal proposal, but I figured I'd weigh in regardless. :P >>> >> >> I think they probably should use namespace... >> > I meant users should use namespace to avoid namespace collisions... We may introduce "PHP" namespace for us to use. I'm +1 for this. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net