Re: [RFC] Basic Scalar Types
| From: | Eli | Date: | Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:20:20 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Basic Scalar Types | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-84694@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Not that another +1 is needed, but I'm with Andi here. I do personally
like this 3rd proposal as an option, if nothing else because it
implements the 'simpler base' at the moment, and allows us, once people
are used to this being part of the language, to continue to evolve
later. And that evolution can be based upon our real world experience
of using this 'base level' of typehinting for a while.
Versus the more complicated versions, of which both Zeev's and Anthony's
are. In each their own way.
Eli
On 3/13/15 1:17 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Agree and I would vote +1 on this even if I'd prefer coercive. It is a
> very valid option for a 7.0 and it is future proof.
--
| Eli White | http://eliw.com/ | Twitter: EliW |
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc