Re: [RFC] Basic Scalar Types
| From: | Philip Sturgeon | Date: | Fri, 13 Mar 2015 21:16:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Basic Scalar Types | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-84721@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Derick Rethans [mailto:derick@php.net]
>> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 10:34 PM
>> To: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; Stelian Mocanita
>> Cc: Eli; PHP Internals List
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types
>>
>>Chance of this RFC passing is going to be slim, as it only caters for one
>>of the
>> three groups that Antony described...
>>
>> I certainly will vote against it.
>
> You may very well be right, but the only way of truly knowing would be
> putting it up for a vote. I'd feel a lot more comfortable if this was also
> available for a vote before moving my nay to yay on the Dual Mode RFC.
>
> Zeev
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
Votes for you. Votes for you. Votes for everyone!
Get Oprah in here.
But seriously Zeev, I read this as "lets do literally anything we can,
regardless of rules and process to avoid having the RFC that is
currently winning actually pass.
I don't want to assume this is a sneaky, underhand tactic, but it sure
does look quite like it.