Re: [RFC] Basic Scalar Types

I'll switch my vote on STH v5 to YES. If we get Basic STH into voting phase, I change my vote to NO and vote on YES on Basic STH. []s, On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 14, 2015 9:24 AM, "Zeev Suraski" <zeev@zend.com> wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: stelian.mocanita@gmail.com [mailto:stelian.mocanita@gmail.com] > > > On Behalf Of Stelian Mocanita > > > Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2015 12:18 AM > > > To: Pierre Joye > > > Cc: Zeev Suraski; PHP internals; Benjamin Eberlei > > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Basic Scalar Types > > > > > > Zeev, allow me to understand how this goes. Bob's discussions on the > RFC > > > started 2 days ago. Based on the current rules, the RFC can only go to > > > vote > > > after 2 weeks. That means in 12 days starting now. > > > > > > So we are either violating the RFC rules by pushing the vote tomorrow > or > > > we're delaying PHP7 for another 2 weeks maybe yet another TH RFC > passes? > > > > Bob's RFC is effectively Andrea's v0.1 RFC which was discussed in detail > and > > introduced well over two weeks ago. > > No it is not. It is a new one, period. Just like this other rfc, discussed > months ago just went to vote without any discussions. > > This is not the way it works and it has the bad taste of political moves. > > > I hope we're not going to go into more and more extremes of playing a law > > firm and not an OS project. > > So law is firm when it fits your goal but flexible when not? We have > relatively strict rules for this exact reason: nk double standard. Stop > playing with the rules and stand as someone willing to find compromises. > -- Guilherme Blanco MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com GTalk: guilhermeblanco Toronto - ON/Canada