Re: PHP 7.1 - Address PHPSadness #28?
| From: | Rowan Collins | Date: | Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:15:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP 7.1 - Address PHPSadness #28? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-88372@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 18 September 2015 23:16:51 BST, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
> I don't
>see any 'completely new type of code' ... only a different frame in
>which the variables are held.
It's "completely new" because you can't do it right now, that's all.
I'm just trying to separate two different justifications for requesting this feature: some
people are saying their current code is buggy because of some lack in the language, and that
"thousands and millions of devs" encounter this; others, such as yourself, are saying that
they would like to write code in a certain style, which the language doesn't currently allow. I
have still seen absolutely no evidence of the former, most bugs apparently being due to poor
adoption of array_key_exists; I am reasonably convinced by your use case being valid, even if
it's not a style I'd choose.
Every time you start talking about avoiding notices, and existing code, I therefore get confused -
there is no code using exists() in order for it to be buggy!
Regards,
--
Rowan Collins
[IMSoP]