Re: Internals and Newcomers and the Sidelines (WAS: Adopt Code of Conduct)
| From: | Paul M. Jones | Date: | Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:12:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Internals and Newcomers and the Sidelines (WAS: Adopt Code of Conduct) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-90610@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi all,
> On Jan 12, 2016, at 17:07, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>
> Out of 45 approved RFC, 34 would have cleared a 90% bar, 35 would have cleared an 85% bar, and
> 38 would have cleared a 75% bar.
>
> To the best of my recollection, all of the RFCs that generated major storms fall in the these 7
> RFCs that cleared the 67% mark, but failed the 75% mark.
>
> Very importantly, out of the RFCs that cleared 85% and 90% - none had more than 5 people
> opposing, most had 0, and most of the rest had less than 3.
>
> It's also worth noting that once you clear the 75% mark, you're very likely to also
> clear 85% and 90%. Only 3 RFCs cleared 75% and didn't clear 90%.
>
> What I'm getting at is this:
>
> Most passed RFCs are manage to gain something that's very close to consensus, way higher
> than 2/3, with barely a handful of people opposing.
>
> If the vote is close to 2/3 - there are very high chances that the RFC is controversial, that
> people who oppose it will be opposing it passionately, and that as civilized as we try to be - bad
> vibes are likely to ensue.
This is a very interesting analysis, and I find it appealing.
An alternative interpretation might be: "As people feel an RFC is near the pass/fail point,
they argue it more vociferously." That's more ... dynamic? ... interpretation, in that it
doesn't matter where the pass/fail point is (2/3, 3/4, etc); conversational volume increases
around that point wherever it is. When the perceived support is much higher, or much lower, than the
pass/fail point, the conversational volume decreases.
That's an untested hypothesis, of course. If it's true, though, it means that raising the
bar to 4/5 means conversational volume will increase only for RFCs that already have very high
support, which is probably not the intended consequence of raising the bar.
--
Paul M. Jones
pmjones88@gmail.com
http://paul-m-jones.com
Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP
https://leanpub.com/mlaphp
Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP
https://leanpub.com/sn1php