Re: [RFC] PHP Attributes
| From: | Dominic Grostate | Date: | Thu, 21 Apr 2016 23:16:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] PHP Attributes | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-92621@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
This is amazing. It would actually allow us to implement our automated
assertions ourselves, as opposed to requiring it within the language.
Could it also support references?
<<sanitize(&$a)>>
function foo($a) {
}
On 21 Apr 2016 10:13 p.m., "Dmitry Stogov" <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I would like to present an RFC proposing support for native annotation.
>
> The naming, syntax and behavior are mostly influenced by HHVM Hack, but
> not exactly the same.
>
> The most interesting difference is an ability to use arbitrary PHP
> expressions as attribute values.
>
> These expressions are not evaluated, but stored as Abstract Syntax Trees,
> and later may be accessed (node by node) in PHP extensions, preprocessors
> and PHP scripts their selves. I think this ability may be useful for
> "Design By Contract", other formal verification systems, Aspect Oriented
> Programming, etc
>
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/attributes
>
>
> Note that this approach is going to be native, in contrast to doc-comment
> approach that uses not well defined syntax, and even not parsed by PHP
> itself.
>
>
> Additional ideas, endorsement and criticism are welcome.
>
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>