Re: [RFC] PHP Attributes
| From: | Fleshgrinder | Date: | Sun, 24 Apr 2016 19:40:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] PHP Attributes | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-92700@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 4/24/2016 6:57 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
> Genuine question[1]: how is @attr() different than
>
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc
<<attr()>>? Also,
> isn't @attr() 100% valid user-land code today that can
> precede
> function or constant declarations?
>
> [1] I don't like that I have to make that explicit but it is what it is.
>
ROFL, that is actually totally true and I never thought about it. Damn
silencing operator! :P
However, i still think that the brackets are unnecessary and make it
look like function calls.
<<annotation values>>
function f() {}
--
Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc