Re: [RFC] PHP Attributes
| From: | Niklas Keller | Date: | Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:51:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] PHP Attributes | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-92717@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
>
> I think that the Hack name attributes is unintelligible and annotations
>> would be much clearer to any audience. Simply because the name is very
>> well known.
>>
>
> Different languages names this differently.
> I may add an additional voting question - "annotation vs attributes?".
The description on https://wiki.php.net/rfc even uses
"annotation" to
explain what "PHP Attributes" is,
so I think "annotation"is the right naming choice.
PHP Attributes
> Native support for annotation (Discussion began 2016-04-22)
Annotation is well known and unambiguous.
Regards, Niklas.