Re: [RFC] PHP Attributes
| From: | Dmitry Stogov | Date: | Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:14:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] PHP Attributes | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-92804@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Just because HHVM is closer to PHP than C#.
________________________________
From: Dominic Grostate <codekestrel@googlemail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 19:43
To: Dmitry Stogov
Cc: rowan.collins@gmail.com; PHP internals; Stanislav Malyshev
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] PHP Attributes
Why not like C#?
[Description("My Function")]
function my_function()
{}
Without the semicolon, this wouldn't be valid in any other context.
On 26 Apr 2016 8:41 a.m., "Dmitry Stogov" <dmitry@zend.com<mailto:dmitry@zend.com>> wrote:
On 04/25/2016 11:20 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
No, but this is valid:
@atrr(); function foo() { ... }
That's perhaps a little too close for comfort...?
That's different syntax. If you put ; in the middle of statement, it can
change - "$c = $a + $b;" is not the same as "$c = $a; + $b;" - but
nobody thinks + can not be used because of that. As I said, << and >>
are existing operators too, so if you are creative enough, I'm sure you
can find cases like that too.
Hi Stas,
You may try to replace attribute syntax with @attr(...) (without semicolon) into our PHP parser.
Note that we have LALR grammar + restrictions caused by semantic actions.
If you are able to do this, I'll add it into the RFC as an option.
Thanks. Dmitry.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php