Re: Re: ext/curl update
| From: | Pierrick Charron | Date: | Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:19:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: ext/curl update | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-92837@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I agree, but I don't really now how I could test those things since they
almost all of the time only affect how libcurl will handle the
request/cache and we have no way to retrieve options like curl_easy_getopt
or something similar.
On 27 April 2016 at 02:46, Anatol Belski <anatol.php@belski.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: me@daveyshafik.com [mailto:me@daveyshafik.com] On Behalf Of Davey
> > Shafik
> > Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 2:25 AM
> > To: Pierrick Charron <pierrick@adoy.net>
> > Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>; pajoye@php.net
> > Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: ext/curl update
> >
> > Hi Pierrick,
> >
> > This should be in master for 7.1, alongside my RFC'ed patch for server
> push
> > support.
> >
> > You emailed me directly about the aforementioned patch so I'll just
> respond
> > here as it's relevant:
> >
> > The patch should hit in 7.1 but it has been requested that tests be
> added — and
> > we can't add tests with a server push supporting HTTP/2 server against
> which to
> > push.
> >
> As from the patch, many constants have nothing to do with HTTP/2
> implementation and add just name/value without any further logic. If there
> were a reduced patch with only such cases, it would be acceptable for 7.0
> as well and there were probably no collisions expected. What do you think?
>
> Regards
>
> Anatol
>
>