Re: Re: [RFC] ifsetor operator

I guess this would only help the lazy guys around. There are many other ways to get around this without writing that many ternary constructs eg: <?php function get_post_var ( $name , $default ) {

    return isset ( $_POST[ $name ] ) ? $_POST[ $name ] : $default ;

} $CUST_ID = (integer) get_post_var ( 'CUST_ID' , 0 ); $EMPL_ID = (integer) get_post_var ( 'EMPL_ID' , 0 ); ... ?> -- red Jason Garber wrote:

Yeah, When we first switched to E_ALL error mode, I thought "Cool, I'll just put an @ in front of these expressions" Not cool. It was taking FOREVER (like seconds) to load a simple page that had been taking ~ 20ms. After that we switched to the ternary operator, and hence began the ifsetor() discussion... ~Jason At 4/17/2004 02:44 AM +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:

Hello Alan, Saturday, April 17, 2004, 2:36:55 AM, you wrote:

Jason Garber wrote:

In our code, you will find many blocks looking like $CUST_ID = (integer) (isset($_POST['CUST_ID']) ? $_POST['CUST_ID']

: 0);

so how is that different from $CUST_ID = (integer) @$_POST['CUST_ID'];

@ is damn slow -- Best regards,

 Marcus                            mailto:helly@php.net

-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php