Re: [RFC][Vote] Typed Properties

I vote no for the same performance reason, but the whole Hoa's community is agree with the RFC. Thanks for the hard work! On 23/05/16 11:02, Dmitry Stogov wrote:

I appreciate the work done by Joe, but I vote "no", because the implementation is not good enough yet - it's incompatible with opcache (may be it's not a big problem to fix this) - typed properties assignment is going to be 2-3 times slower ($obj->x += 2; is 3 times slower) - the patch makes slight negative effect even for untyped properties - the proposed behavior for uninitialized typed properties assumes that they have to be checked on each "read". This checks will have to be performed even in native JITed code. I don't see a reason for typing if we have to perform check on each read anyway. Thanks. Dmitry. ________________________________________ From: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 11:30:09 AM To: Joe Watkins; PHP internals; Phil Sturgeon Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Vote] Typed Properties Hi Joe, The performance effect of this implementation is terrible. Assignment to typed property is 2.3 times slower. Assignment to untyped property in a class with typed properties is 1.8 times slower. See the benchmark https://gist.github.com/dstogov/1b678712adeee51665cdd829195bb800 Thanks. Dmitry. ________________________________________ From: Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 9:05:34 AM To: PHP internals; Phil Sturgeon Subject: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Vote] Typed Properties Morning internals,

     Since we have our answer on nullable types, typed properties can now go

to vote.

     https://wiki.php.net/rfc/typed-properties#vote

     Note that, support for nullability as RFC'd will be merged when the

implementation for nullable_types is merged into master.

     Please participate.

Cheers Joe -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php