Re: [RFC][Vote] Typed Properties

On 25/05/16 22:03, Fleshgrinder wrote: > We already have the differentiation between IS_NULL and IS_UNDEF, why > not expose the latter to userland? Is this not simply a mistake? The whole reason for null in my book is that it IS 'undefined'. We have to have a flag for it since you can't easily identify it as a 'value' stored im the variable. I think I can see why some people would want to know if a variable has not been initialised, but null still fits that requirement. When any variable is created it IS_NULL until such time as a value is assigned - and a type of value established. In my book an assignment will check for more than IS_INT so using typed variables is of little advantage. But if I test for a value and find null then I know it has not yet been initialised. IS_UNDEF can't exist if there is no named variable to attach it to, so user land gets an error that the variable does not exist. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk