Re: [RFC][Vote] Typed Properties

On 5/25/2016 11:35 PM, Thomas Bley wrote: > Following "Type safety is the goal of this RFC, not validating objects.", it would be > better to do implicit casting for uninitialized properties (whenever implicit casting is possible) > or use null for nullable types: > > class A { > public int $x; > public ?int $y = null; > public int $z = 42; > public ?int $u; > public ?datetime $v; > public datetime $w; > } > > $a = new A; > var_dump($a->x); // 0 + notice > var_dump($a->y); // null > var_dump($a->z); // 42 > unset($a->z); > var_dump($a->z); // 0 + notice > var_dump($a->u); // null + notice > var_dump($a->v); // null + notice > var_dump($a->w); // Fatal error, uninitialized... > This was proposed many times but it renders checks whether something was initialized or not completely useless and is not really a solution to the problem at hand. -- Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc