Re: Re: C89 vs. C99
| From: | Joe Watkins | Date: | Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:40:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: C89 vs. C99 | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-96847@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Morning,
> okay, I'm only really interested in declarations mixed with code
Not sure if serious ... but I will harass you to change code that is mixi
[1].
I think actually disallowing mixing lends some readability and uniformity
to the code in php-src, that I would hate to see disappear ...
Cheers
Joe
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myxomatosis?
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de>
wrote:
> On 12.06.2016 at 11:08, Fleshgrinder wrote:
>
> > I am curious why we are not finally doing the switch to C99 with VC14
> > finally supporting most of C99. I mean, I know that GCC and VC14 do no
> > fully support C99 but the most common features are implemented:
> >
> > - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C99#Implementations
> > - https://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html
>
> What about other compilers such as Solaris Studio and XL C?
>
> --
> Christoph M. Becker
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>