Re: Re: C89 vs. C99

From: Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:40:13 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: C89 vs. C99
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-96847@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Morning, > okay, I'm only really interested in declarations mixed with code Not sure if serious ... but I will harass you to change code that is mixi [1]. I think actually disallowing mixing lends some readability and uniformity to the code in php-src, that I would hate to see disappear ... Cheers Joe [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myxomatosis? On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> wrote: > On 12.06.2016 at 11:08, Fleshgrinder wrote: > > > I am curious why we are not finally doing the switch to C99 with VC14 > > finally supporting most of C99. I mean, I know that GCC and VC14 do no > > fully support C99 but the most common features are implemented: > > > > - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C99#Implementations > > - https://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html > > What about other compilers such as Solaris Studio and XL C? > > -- > Christoph M. Becker > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >

« previous php.internals (#96847) next »