Re: Re: C89 vs. C99
| From: | Levi Morrison | Date: | Sat, 12 Nov 2016 14:27:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: C89 vs. C99 | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-96855@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 12.06.2016 at 11:08, Fleshgrinder wrote:
>
>> I am curious why we are not finally doing the switch to C99 with VC14
>> finally supporting most of C99. I mean, I know that GCC and VC14 do no
>> fully support C99 but the most common features are implemented:
>>
>> - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C99#Implementations
>> - https://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html
>
> What about other compilers such as Solaris Studio and XL C?
>
> --
> Christoph M. Becker
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Last time this came up some of us started putting together test cases
for people to check compilers with. See
https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/phpnextctest
If you have access to any of these compilers we care about please
test. If you would like to see more kinds of tests please add them.