Re: Re: C89 vs. C99
| From: | Christoph M. Becker | Date: | Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:15:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: C89 vs. C99 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-96856@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 12.11.2016 at 15:27, Levi Morrison wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> On 12.06.2016 at 11:08, Fleshgrinder wrote:
>>
>>> I am curious why we are not finally doing the switch to C99 with VC14
>>> finally supporting most of C99. I mean, I know that GCC and VC14 do no
>>> fully support C99 but the most common features are implemented:
>>>
>>> - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C99#Implementations
>>> - https://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html
>>
>> What about other compilers such as Solaris Studio and XL C?
>
> Last time this came up some of us started putting together test cases
> for people to check compilers with. See
> https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/phpnextctest
Thanks, Levi.
> If you have access to any of these compilers we care about please
> test. If you would like to see more kinds of tests please add them.
No, I don't have access to those compilers – I just remember that these
compilers have been mentioned in somewhat recent bug reports, so I
wanted to bring up this issue.
--
Christoph M. Becker