Re: Re: C89 vs. C99

From: Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:15:17 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: C89 vs. C99
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-96856@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 12.11.2016 at 15:27, Levi Morrison wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> wrote: > >> On 12.06.2016 at 11:08, Fleshgrinder wrote: >> >>> I am curious why we are not finally doing the switch to C99 with VC14 >>> finally supporting most of C99. I mean, I know that GCC and VC14 do no >>> fully support C99 but the most common features are implemented: >>> >>> - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C99#Implementations >>> - https://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html >> >> What about other compilers such as Solaris Studio and XL C? > > Last time this came up some of us started putting together test cases > for people to check compilers with. See > https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/phpnextctest Thanks, Levi. > If you have access to any of these compilers we care about please > test. If you would like to see more kinds of tests please add them. No, I don't have access to those compilers – I just remember that these compilers have been mentioned in somewhat recent bug reports, so I wanted to bring up this issue. -- Christoph M. Becker

« previous php.internals (#96856) next »