Re: Re: C89 vs. C99
| From: | Dennis Clarke | Date: | Sat, 12 Nov 2016 19:28:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: C89 vs. C99 | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-96861@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 11/12/2016 06:27 AM, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
On 12.06.2016 at 11:08, Fleshgrinder wrote:Oracle Studio compiler tools are fully compliant with C99 and has been for a very very long time. I would also note that php7.x does not compile out of the box, yet. However I am looking into why. Dennis ClarkeI am curious why we are not finally doing the switch to C99 with VC14 finally supporting most of C99. I mean, I know that GCC and VC14 do no fully support C99 but the most common features are implemented: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C99#Implementations - https://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.htmlWhat about other compilers such as Solaris Studio and XL C?